<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LiveCD News &#187; Benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livecdnews.com/category/main/benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livecdnews.com</link>
	<description>News from the LiveCD World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 05:11:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Battle of the Thumb Drive Linux Systems</title>
		<link>http://www.livecdnews.com/2008/10/27/battle-of-the-thumb-drive-linux-systems/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=battle-of-the-thumb-drive-linux-systems</link>
		<comments>http://www.livecdnews.com/2008/10/27/battle-of-the-thumb-drive-linux-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 21:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damn Small Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fedora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightweight Desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puppy Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecdnews.com/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lifehacker took four Linux distros, put them on USB flash drives, and ran a Lifehacker Faceoff. Today we&#8217;re detailing four no-install distributions—Damn Small Linux, Puppy Linux, Xubuntu, and Fedora—and helping you decide which might work for that spare thumb drive you&#8217;ve got lying around, or as just a part of your multi-gig monster stick.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lifehacker took four Linux distros, put them on USB flash drives, and ran a <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5069054/battle-of-the-thumb-drive-linux-systems">Lifehacker Faceoff</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Today we&#8217;re detailing four no-install distributions—Damn Small Linux, Puppy Linux, Xubuntu, and Fedora—and helping you decide which might work for that spare thumb drive you&#8217;ve got lying around, or as just a part of your multi-gig monster stick.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.livecdnews.com/2008/10/27/battle-of-the-thumb-drive-linux-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel vs. AMD: Today&#8217;s generation compared</title>
		<link>http://www.livecdnews.com/2007/03/23/intel-vs-amd-todays-generation-compared/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=intel-vs-amd-todays-generation-compared</link>
		<comments>http://www.livecdnews.com/2007/03/23/intel-vs-amd-todays-generation-compared/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Folding Benchmark CD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livecdnews.com/2007/03/23/intel-vs-amd-todays-generation-compared/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tech Report used a Linux LiveCD to benchmark the latest processors from AMD and Intel. notfred&#8217;s Folding Benchmark CD tests the most common work unit types and estimates performance in terms of the points per day that a CPU could earn for a Folding team member. The CD itself is a bootable ISO. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tech Report used a Linux LiveCD to <a href="http://techreport.com/reviews/2007q1/cpus/index.x?pg=11">benchmark the latest processors</a> from AMD and Intel.</p>
<blockquote><p> notfred&#8217;s Folding Benchmark CD tests the most common work unit types and estimates performance in terms of the points per day that a CPU could earn for a Folding team member. The CD itself is a bootable ISO. The CD boots into Linux, detects the system&#8217;s processors and Ethernet adapters, picks up an IP address, and downloads the latest versions of the Folding execution cores from Stanford. It then processes a sample work unit of each type.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.livecdnews.com/2007/03/23/intel-vs-amd-todays-generation-compared/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

